To get timesheets in on time, fix three things in this order: make entry quick, then automate a personal, escalating chase, then make the submission rate visible to everyone. Most businesses start with reminders. Reminders help, but they treat the symptom — people are late because entering time is annoying, and no reminder fixes that.
This post works through each layer with the specific changes to make, what the chase should actually say, and what a realistic result looks like.
Where the chasing week actually goes
Before changing anything, look at where the effort goes now. In most businesses it is not the entry itself. It is everything wrapped around the entry: finding people, working out what is missing, following up, and fixing what came in wrong.
Example: a 60-person business with one admin responsible for collection. Your split will differ; the shape usually does not.
Every bar on that chart is something a better process removes. Only one of them — the chasing — is what reminders address.
1. Reduce the cost of entering
People are late because entry is annoying. Look hard at what you ask for:
- Does entry require a laptop, when the work happens on site?
- How many fields are mandatory that nobody ever reads?
- Does the person have to look up a project code from a separate document?
A mobile capture form with the project list pre-loaded removes most lateness before a single reminder is sent.
- 01Paper sheetfilled in from memory on Friday
- 02Photographed and textedto the site admin
- 03Project codes looked upfrom a PDF list, often wrong
- 04Retyped into Excelby the admin on Monday
- 05Queried and correctedby email, midweek
- 01Daily entry on the phonetwo minutes at the end of the shift
- 02Project picked from a listonly active projects, pre-loaded
- 03Hours default from the rosteredit only what changed
- 04Submitted to a listno retyping, timestamped
- 05Approved in Teamssupervisor taps approve or sends back
Audit your fields
Go through the current form, field by field, with whoever uses the data downstream — usually payroll and the project accountants. For each field, ask who reads it and what they do with it.
| Field | Who reads it | Keep? |
|---|---|---|
| Project | Job costing, PMs | Yes — pick from a list, never type |
| Hours per day | Payroll, job costing | Yes — default from the roster |
| Cost code | Job costing | Only if it is actually used to report |
| Task description | Usually nobody | Make optional |
| Supervisor name | Approval routing | No — derive it from the project |
Most forms can lose a third of their fields this way. Each one you remove is a reason to procrastinate gone.
For crews in the field, a small Power App on the phone usually beats a web form: it can remember the last project, work with patchy reception, and open in two taps. For office staff, a form in Teams is often enough.
2. Automate the chase
Only then automate reminders — and make them personal and escalating, not a blanket email to all staff.
- ThursdayA direct Teams message to anyone with incomplete entries, listing the missing days
- FridayThe same message, plus their manager
- MondayA summary to the ops lead of what is still outstanding, by team
The critical detail is that the reminder names the missing days. "Your timesheet is incomplete" gets ignored. "Tuesday and Wednesday are blank" gets action, because it tells the person exactly what to do and how long it will take.
A few more details that separate a chase people respond to from one they filter:
- Send it from a person's name or a clearly named account, not a no-reply address.
- Link straight to the entry screen for the missing day, not to a home page.
- Skip people on leave. Pull leave from wherever it lives, or the first week of reminders to someone on holiday will discredit the whole thing.
- Stop when it is done. If the entries arrive at 3pm Thursday, the Friday reminder must not go.
This is a straightforward Power Automate build when the timesheet data lives in a SharePoint list or Dataverse table: a scheduled flow compares expected days against entries and messages the gaps. The fiddly part is the expected days — rosters, part-timers and leave — so settle where that comes from before building.
3. Make the deadline visible
A simple dashboard showing submission rate by team turns an admin nag into a visible team metric. This works better than escalation, and costs you nothing further once the data is in a list.
Show it where people already look: a tile on the intranet home page, a tab in the team's Teams channel, or a slide at the Monday toolbox talk. Keep it to submission rate by team for the current week and the trend over the last few weeks. Do not name individuals on a shared screen; that is for the manager's view.
Whether to build it in Power BI or keep it in Excel depends on who needs to see it and how often — Power BI or Excel for ops reporting covers that choice.
What it is worth
You can put a rough number on the chasing with simple inputs. The figures below are an illustrative example, not a benchmark — swap in your own.
That is 9 × 46 × $50, using the hours from the chart above. It excludes the cost that is harder to see: late timesheets push back invoicing on cost-plus and do-and-charge work, and job cost reports are wrong until the last sheet arrives. Run your own inputs through the calculator if you want to compare it against a build.
What to expect
You will not get to 100%. Aim for the point where the exceptions are few enough that a person can handle them in ten minutes, rather than a week of chasing.
Expect a rough first fortnight. Some people will keep sending photos of paper sheets out of habit; supervisors will forget to approve in Teams. Handle those individually rather than reverting to the old process for everyone, and resist adding fields back to the form when someone asks — check first whether anyone will actually read them.
Expect most of the improvement to come from the first layer — easier entry — with the reminders mopping up the habitual late submitters. The dashboard keeps it there once the novelty wears off.
- Every field on the current form has a named reader, or it goes
- The active project list has one source and one owner
- Rosters and leave are available somewhere a flow can read them
- Supervisors have agreed to approve in Teams, not by email
- One person owns the process and the exceptions
- The payroll or job costing export stays manual for the first month
What to do next
This week, sit with whoever chases timesheets and list every field on the form alongside who reads it. Delete what nobody reads. Then decide where the project list and rosters will come from — that is the foundation for both the mobile form and the chase.
Timesheet collection is also the second item in our list of five flows construction businesses should build first, and for good reason: it is frequent, bounded and fixes month-end before you touch payroll.
If your timesheet process needs a dedicated chaser, you are paying a salary to compensate for a form.
Want the version for your business?
Work out what manual processes are costing you — three minutes, no contact details needed.
Work out the cost